El concepto de prevencion


The concept of prevention: a good idea gone astray?

B Starfield1, J Hyde2,3, J Gérvas4,5, I Heath6

1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
2 Victoria Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Australia
3 Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
4 Equipo CESCA, Madrid, Spain
5 Canencia de la Sierra (Madrid), Spain
6 Caversham Group Practice, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr B Starfield, Professor of Health Policy, 624 N Broadway, room 452, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-1990, USA; bstarfie@jhsph.edu

Over time, the definition of prevention has expanded so that its meaning in the context of health services is now unclear. As risk factors are increasingly considered to be the equivalent of “diseases” for purposes of intervention, the concept of prevention has lost all practical meaning. This paper reviews the inconsistencies in its utility, and suggests principles that it should follow in the future: a population orientation with explicit consideration of attributable risk, the setting of priorities based on reduction in illness and avoidance of adverse effects, and the imperative to reduce inequities in health.

Texto completo en PDF

About these ads
This entry was posted in Barbara Starfield, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Juan Gervas, Prevencion. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s