

Background
Published Online: 09 June 2011
Image via WikipediaGriffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ, et al. Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2011 Jun 24. (Original) PMID: 21705063
BACKGROUND: Intensive treatment of multiple cardiovascular risk factors can halve mortality among people with established type 2 diabetes. We investigated the effect of early multifactorial treatment after diagnosis by screening.
METHODS: In a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, parallel-group trial done in Denmark, the Netherlands, and the UK, 343 general practices were randomly assigned screening of registered patients aged 40-69 years without known diabetes followed by routine care of diabetes or screening followed by intensive treatment of multiple risk factors. The primary endpoint was first cardiovascular event, including cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, revascularisation, and non-traumatic amputation within 5 years. Patients and staff assessing outcomes were unaware of the practice`s study group assignment. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00237549.
FINDINGS: Primary endpoint data were available for 3055 (99.9%) of 3057 screen-detected patients. The mean age was 60.3 (SD 6.9) years and the mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 (SD 1.6) years. Improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (HbA(1c) and cholesterol concentrations and blood pressure) were slightly but significantly better in the intensive treatment group. The incidence of first cardiovascular event was 7.2% (13.5 per 1000 person-years) in the intensive treatment group and 8.5% (15.9 per 1000 person-years) in the routine care group (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.65-1.05), and of all-cause mortality 6.2% (11.6 per 1000 person-years) and 6.7% (12.5 per 1000 person-years; 0.91, 0.69-1.21), respectively.
INTERPRETATION: An intervention to promote early intensive management of patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with a small, non-significant reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular events and death.
FUNDING: National Health Service Denmark, Danish Council for Strategic Research, Danish Research Foundation for General Practice, Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Danish National Board of Health, Danish Medical Research Council, Aarhus University Research Foundation, Wellcome Trust, UK Medical Research Council, UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, UK National Health Service R&D, UK National Institute for Health Research, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Novo Nordisk, Astra, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Servier, HemoCue, Merck.
Dos excelentes articulos de Juan Gervas y Barbara Starfield sobre prevencion. Sin duda y como es de esperar, polemicos como siempre. Espero los disfruten:
prevention_concept_JECH_2008.pdf
prevention_Lancet_2008_publ.pdf
![]() |
prevention J.Gerva… |
Hosted by eSnips |
![]() |
prevencion-Gervas … |
Hosted by eSnips |
Dos excelentes articulos de Juan Gervas y Barbara Starfield sobre prevencion. Sin duda y como es de esperar, polemicos como siempre. Espero los disfruten:
prevention_concept_JECH_2008.pdf
prevention_Lancet_2008_publ.pdf
![]() |
prevention J.Gerva… |
Hosted by eSnips |
![]() |
prevencion-Gervas … |
Hosted by eSnips |
Publicado en Lancet: Estudio Trascend
– 5926 pacientes, 2954 recibieron 80 mgr de Telmisartan, 2972 placebo. Estudio aleatorizado, controlado.
– Analisis por intencion de tratar. Seguimiento entre 51 a 64 meses.
– Disminucion de la TA media: HR 0,92 (IC 95% 0.81-1.05). No significativo.
– Resultados de muerte cardiovascular, IAM, ACV: 0,87 (IC 95% 0.76-1.00). Significativo a p 0,05 pero no a 0,01.
– Hospitalizacion por eventos cardiovasculares: RR 0,92 (CI 95% 0.85-0.99). No significativo a p 0.01.
– Telmisartan fue bien tolerado en pacientes que no toleran IECAs. Aunque el medicamento no mostro diferencias significativas en los resultados primariso, los cuales incluyeron fallta cardica, y una modesta reduccion del riesgo de padecer una serie de eventos cardiovascularses mayores compuestos (muerte cardiovascular, IAM, ACV).
– Financiamiento: Boheringer Ingelheim.
Conclusion: para que sirve el telmisartan????
Publicado en Lancet: Estudio Trascend
– 5926 pacientes, 2954 recibieron 80 mgr de Telmisartan, 2972 placebo. Estudio aleatorizado, controlado.
– Analisis por intencion de tratar. Seguimiento entre 51 a 64 meses.
– Disminucion de la TA media: HR 0,92 (IC 95% 0.81-1.05). No significativo.
– Resultados de muerte cardiovascular, IAM, ACV: 0,87 (IC 95% 0.76-1.00). Significativo a p 0,05 pero no a 0,01.
– Hospitalizacion por eventos cardiovasculares: RR 0,92 (CI 95% 0.85-0.99). No significativo a p 0.01.
– Telmisartan fue bien tolerado en pacientes que no toleran IECAs. Aunque el medicamento no mostro diferencias significativas en los resultados primariso, los cuales incluyeron fallta cardica, y una modesta reduccion del riesgo de padecer una serie de eventos cardiovascularses mayores compuestos (muerte cardiovascular, IAM, ACV).
– Financiamiento: Boheringer Ingelheim.
Conclusion: para que sirve el telmisartan????
Exposure to paracetamol during intrauterine life, childhood, and adult life may increase the risk of developing asthma. We studied 6–7-year-old children from Phase Three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) programme to investigate the association between paracetamol consumption and asthma.
As part of Phase Three of ISAAC, parents or guardians of children aged 6–7 years completed written questionnaires about symptoms of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema, and several risk factors, including the use of paracetamol for fever in the child’s first year of life and the frequency of paracetamol use in the past 12 months. The primary outcome variable was the odds ratio (OR) of asthma symptoms in these children associated with the use of paracetamol for fever in the first year of life, as calculated by logistic regression.
205 487 children aged 6–7 years from 73 centres in 31 countries were included in the analysis. In the multivariate analyses, use of paracetamol for fever in the first year of life was associated with an increased risk of asthma symptoms when aged 6–7 years (OR 1·46 [95% CI 1·36–1·56]). Current use of paracetamol was associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of asthma symptoms (1·61 [1·46–1·77] and 3·23 [2·91–3·60] for medium and high use vs no use, respectively). Use of paracetamol was similarly associated with the risk of severe asthma symptoms, with population-attributable risks between 22% and 38%. Paracetamol use, both in the first year of life and in children aged 6–7 years, was also associated with an increased risk of symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema.
Use of paracetamol in the first year of life and in later childhood, is associated with risk of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema at age 6 to 7 years. We suggest that exposure to paracetamol might be a risk factor for the development of asthma in childhood.
The BUPA Foundation, the Health Research Council of New Zealand, the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation of New Zealand, the Hawke’s Bay Medical Research Foundation, the Waikato Medical Research Foundation, Glaxo Wellcome New Zealand, the New Zealand Lottery Board, Astra Zeneca New Zealand, and Glaxo Wellcome International Medical Affairs.
a. Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
b. Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
c. Department of Medicine, Otago University Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
d. Dr von Haunersches University Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Germany
e. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
f. Department of Medicine, University of Malta, Malta
g. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Correspondence to: Prof Richard Beasley, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, PO Box 10055, Wellington 6143, New Zealand
Exposure to paracetamol during intrauterine life, childhood, and adult life may increase the risk of developing asthma. We studied 6–7-year-old children from Phase Three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) programme to investigate the association between paracetamol consumption and asthma.
As part of Phase Three of ISAAC, parents or guardians of children aged 6–7 years completed written questionnaires about symptoms of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema, and several risk factors, including the use of paracetamol for fever in the child’s first year of life and the frequency of paracetamol use in the past 12 months. The primary outcome variable was the odds ratio (OR) of asthma symptoms in these children associated with the use of paracetamol for fever in the first year of life, as calculated by logistic regression.
205 487 children aged 6–7 years from 73 centres in 31 countries were included in the analysis. In the multivariate analyses, use of paracetamol for fever in the first year of life was associated with an increased risk of asthma symptoms when aged 6–7 years (OR 1·46 [95% CI 1·36–1·56]). Current use of paracetamol was associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of asthma symptoms (1·61 [1·46–1·77] and 3·23 [2·91–3·60] for medium and high use vs no use, respectively). Use of paracetamol was similarly associated with the risk of severe asthma symptoms, with population-attributable risks between 22% and 38%. Paracetamol use, both in the first year of life and in children aged 6–7 years, was also associated with an increased risk of symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema.
Use of paracetamol in the first year of life and in later childhood, is associated with risk of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema at age 6 to 7 years. We suggest that exposure to paracetamol might be a risk factor for the development of asthma in childhood.
The BUPA Foundation, the Health Research Council of New Zealand, the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation of New Zealand, the Hawke’s Bay Medical Research Foundation, the Waikato Medical Research Foundation, Glaxo Wellcome New Zealand, the New Zealand Lottery Board, Astra Zeneca New Zealand, and Glaxo Wellcome International Medical Affairs.
a. Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
b. Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
c. Department of Medicine, Otago University Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
d. Dr von Haunersches University Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Germany
e. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
f. Department of Medicine, University of Malta, Malta
g. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Correspondence to: Prof Richard Beasley, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, PO Box 10055, Wellington 6143, New Zealand
Given concerns about the safety of drug-eluting stents, Christoph Stettler and colleagues (Sept 15, p 937) provide the most extensive meta-analysis to date comparing sirolimus-eluting stents, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and bare-metal stents: 38 trials in 18 023 patients.
Asthma guidelines on house dust mites are not evidence-basedIn your Sept 8 Editorial (p 802), you describe the new US guidelines for asthma control as being rigorous and evidence-based. This is not correct for the recommendations on house dust mites.
Lamotrigine and the risk of fulminant hepatic failureI refer to a letter by Debbie Shawcross and colleagues (July 28, p 314), written in response to the SANAD study, in which a case of fatal hepatic failure is attributed to lamotrigine. As the consultant neurologist involved in the care of this patient, I would like to add some relevant information that seems to have been either omitted or neglected: continuous exposure to valproate before the liver failed, and a concomitant acute cytomegalovirus infection.
Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease, and a leading cause of pain and physical disability in older people. It is also associated with a major disease burden in middle-aged people, and represents 4–5% of disability-adjusted life-years in those aged 30–60 years. The burden of disease caused by osteoarthritis is greater for women than for men, and is projected to increase as the population ages. Joint damage in osteoarthritis is caused by several predisposing systemic factors (including genetics), and local mechanical factors (including joint injury and load) that determine its distribution and severity. The knee, hand, and hip are most often affected. Joint damage might be associated with use-related joint pain and restricted movement. Diagnostic criteria are ambiguous and disease assessment is difficult: for example, pain and radiographical severity of joint damage are only weakly associated. Socioeconomic and psychosocial factors have an important role in establishing disease burden for the individual with osteoarthritis, as in many other musculoskeletal diseases.
OriginalesQUASAR Collaborative Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Págs. 2020-2029 R TC (s) PDF (s)
Comentario
Cunningham D, Starling N. Adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. Págs. 1980-1981 TC (s) PDF (s)
Heneghan C, Perera R. Prevention of hepatitis C in Japan: a lesson for us all. Págs. 1982-1983 TC (s) PDF (s)
Korenkov M; Sauerland S. Clinical update: bariatric surgery. Págs. 1988-1990 TC (s) PDF (s)
Seminario
Maartens G, Wilkinson RJ. Tuberculosis. Págs. 2030-2043 R TC (s) PDF (s)
Series
Asaria P, Chisholm D, Mathers C, Ezzati M, Beaglehole R. Chronic disease prevention: health effects and financial costs of strategies to reduce salt intake and control tobacco use. Págs. 2044-2053 R TC PDF
Lim SS, Gaziano TA, Gakidou E, Reddy KS, Farzadfar F, Lozano R, Rodgers A. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in high-risk individuals in low-income and middle-income countries: health effects and costs. Págs. 2054-2062 R TC PDF
by Carlos Fernández Oropesa
Herramientas, consejos, comentarios para implementar e-learning
photography and digital art
Marc Andreessen's Tweets in Blog Form
Just another WordPress.com weblog
Virtual library for artist
Stuff and things.
Diseño de estrategias públicas sociosanitarias
Blog personal de Alfredo Vela , en él encontrarás información sobre Social Media, Marketing, Formación y TICs, sobre todo en formato de infografía.
Historias, prevención y tratamientos en la lucha contra el cáncer.
Inquietudes sobre salud de un médico que también es paciente
Improving Diagnosis and Clinical Practice
Otro mundo es posible
Una fusión de saberes, la piedra rosetta entre la ciencia y las humanidades.
Tu espacio de salud y cuidados online. Todo lo que tu farmacéutico te contaría si tuviera tiempo en la farmacia. RPS 46/15
La voz de algunos médicos de Atención Primaria de Madrid
Pediatría de tarde en Paracuellos del Jarama, Madrid