Alogliptina: nuevo tratamiento para diabéticos


Otro medicamento más, para disminuir la glucemia. Aunque resulte una obviedad, seguimos viendo el desfile de nuevos medicamentos para diabéticos, todos ellos manteniendo la cronicidad, pero ninguno que cure. Podemos llegar a la luna, y alguno que otro satélite viajando hacia otras galaxias. Comunicarnos en directo por videoconferencia a través de un ordenador, o disponer de más tecnologia en nuestro celular, que la que tenia el Apolo XI que llegó a la luna. Pero sigue siendo no rentable pensar en medicamentos que curen. No hay negocio ni para la industria, ni para los médicos. Ni tampoco para los que escribimos alguna evaluación de tecnologia.

Logo for the World Diabetes Day
Logo for the World Diabetes Day (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Via: Galo Sanchez

 

Alogliptina es el segundo DPP-4 que se somete a prueba para averiguar si la morbi-mortalidad CV es menor, igual o mayor que con placebo.

Cristina Tejera[1] ha hecho una evaluación GRADE del estudio EXAMINE, cuyo resultado hemos puesto a disposición de los lectores en evalmed.es, pestaña FORMACIÓN, aunque puede verse directamente en: http://evalmedicamento.weebly.com/formacioacuten/estudio-examine-resultados-cardiovasculares-de-alogliptina-frente-a-placebo-en-pacientes-con-diabetes-mellitus-tipo-2-tras-sindrome-agudo-coronario-cristina-tejera

 

CONCLUSIONES Y RECOMENDACIONES.

 

Pacientes de 61 años con DM2 de 7,3 años de duración, con historia de IAM en uun 87,5% y de ictus en un 7,2%, con mediana de Hb1Ac 8% y FGE media de 71,2 ml/min, según la calidad de la evidencia y la magnitud y precisión de los resultados de este ensayo clínico, hacemos una recomendación fuerte en contra, para la adición de alogliptina el tratamiento convencional.

 

Justificación:

 

A) BENEFICIOS Y RIESGOS AÑADIDOS:

Frente a placebo, alogliptina no mostró diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las variables [Mortalidad CV, IAM o ACV], Mortalidad CV, IAM no fatal, ACV no fatal, Revascularización, ni Muerte por cualquier causa. Tampoco las mostró en las variables recogidas como efectos adversos: Hipoglucemia grave, Hipoglucemia moderada o leve, Pancreatitis aguda, Pancreatitis crónica, Insuficiencia renal con necesidad de diálisis ni Cáncer.

Los autores no aportan datos de “Insuficiencia cardíaca”, variable relevante por cuanto saxagliptina mostró en el estudio SAVOR TIMI 53 una significativamente mayor tasa que placebo.

En cuanto a variables intermedias, desde una Hb1Ac inicial del 8%,, al final del estudio alogliptina bajó hasta el 7,6% frente al 7,9% de placebo, con una Diferencia de Medias -0,36% (IC al 95% -0,43%) que no se tradujo en más beneficios ni en menos daños añadidos de los resultados en salud. No hubo diferencias en la reducción del peso entre ambos.

 

B) INCONVENIENTES: Tomar medicación adicional.

 

C) COSTES: Aún no está comercializado en España, pero suponemos que tendrá un coste similar al resto de fármacos de su grupo ya comercializados.

[1] Cristina Tejera. Endocrinólogo R-4. Servicio Endocrinología. Hospital de Badajoz

AP al dia: resumenes comentados


Los diuréticos aumentan el riesgo de desarrollar diabetes en pacientes hipertensos y los inhibidores de la ARA-II lo disminuyen HTML PPT

El entrenamiento de la musculatura del suelo pélvico es útil para el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria, pero existe poca información sobre cuál es la técnica ideal HTML PPT

El ácido fólico puede ser eficaz para prevenir el deterioro auditivo relacionado con la edad HTML PPT

La presencia de síndrome metabólico aumenta el riesgo de diabetes y de enfermedad cardiovascular HTML PPT

La utilización de inhibidores de la bomba de protones se asocia a un mayor riesgo de fractura de fémur HTML PPT

La vacunación antigripal se asocia a una reducción de la mortalidad de los pacientes con neumonía adquirida en la comunidad HTML

HbA(1c) as a screening tool for detection of Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.


Diabet Med. 2007 Apr;24(4):333-43. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Click here to read LinkOut

Erratum in:
Diabet Med. 2007 Sep;24(9):1054.
Comment in:
Evid Based Med. 2007 Oct;12(5):152.

Bennett CM, Guo M , Dharmage SC .

Department of Public Health, School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia. c.bennett@unimelb.edu.au

AIM: To assess the validity of glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) as a screening tool for early detection of Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Systematic review of primary cross-sectional studies of the accuracy of HbA(1c) for the detection of Type 2 diabetes using the oral glucose tolerance test as the reference standard and fasting plasma glucose as a comparison. RESULTS Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. At certain cut-off points, HbA(1c) has slightly lower sensitivity than fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in detecting diabetes, but slightly higher specificity. For HbA(1c) at a Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and UK Prospective Diabetes Study comparable cut-off point of > or = 6.1%, the sensitivity ranged from 78 to 81% and specificity 79 to 84%. For FPG at a cut-off point of > or = 6.1 mmol/l, the sensitivity ranged from 48 to 64% and specificity from 94 to 98%. Both HbA(1c) and FPG have low sensitivity for the detection of impaired glucose tolerance (around 50%). CONCLUSIONS HbA(1c) and FPG are equally effective screening tools for the detection of Type 2 diabetes. The HbA(1c) cut-off point of > 6.1% was the recommended optimum cut-off point for HbA(1c) in most reviewed studies; however, there is an argument for population-specific cut-off points as optimum cut-offs vary by ethnic group, age, gender and population prevalence of diabetes. Previous studies have demonstrated that HbA(1c) has less intra-individual variation and better predicts both micro- and macrovascular complications. Although the current cost of HbA(1c) is higher than FPG, the additional benefits in predicting costly preventable clinical complications may make this a cost-effective choice.

PMID: 17367307 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Related Links

See all Related Articles…

 Display SummaryBriefAbstractAbstractPlusCitation MEDLINEXMLUI ListLinkOutASN.1Related Articles Cited in BooksCancerChrom LinksDomain Links3D Domain Links GEO DataSet LinksGene LinksGene (GeneRIF) LinksGenome Links Project LinksGENSAT LinksGEO Profile LinksHomoloGene LinksCoreNucleotide Links CoreNucleotide (RefSeq) LinksEST LinksEST (RefSeq) Links GSS LinksGSS (RefSeq) LinksNucleotide LinksNucleotide (RefSeq) Links OMIA LinksOMIM (calculated) LinksOMIM (cited) LinksBioAssay Links Compound LinksCompound (MeSH Keyword)Compound (Publisher) LinksSubstance Links Substance (MeSH Keyword)Substance (Publisher) LinksPMC Links Cited in PMCPopSet LinksProbe LinksProtein LinksProtein (RefSeq) Links Protein Cluster LinksCited ArticlesSNP LinksStructure Links Taxonomy via GenBankUniGene LinksUniSTS Links Show 5102050100200500 Sort ByPub Date First AuthorLast AuthorJournal Send toTextFilePrinterClipboardE-mail Order
 

Journal Watch: Diabetes


In a New Meta-Analysis, Thiazolidinediones Increase CHF but Not Cardiac Death

General Medicine | Summary and Comment | Subscription Required

The results aren’t inconsistent with previous meta-analyses.

By Bruce Soloway, MD

October 11, 2007

Covering: Lago RM et al. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1129

Cleland JGF and Atkin SL. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1103

Montori VM et al. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1104

Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1101

Thiazolidinediones and Increased MI Risk: A Class Effect?

Cardiology | Summary and Comment | Subscription Required

New meta-analyses support an increased risk for MI with rosiglitazone, but not with pioglitazone.

By JoAnne M. Foody, MD

October 10, 2007

Covering: Lincoff AM et al. JAMA 2007 Sep 12; 298:1180

Singh S et al. JAMA 2007 Sep 12; 298:1189

Routine Use of Perindopril and Indapamide in Type 2 Diabetes

Cardiology | Summary and Comment | Subscription Required

A simple and practical strategy emerges as an ADVANCE in the prevention of vascular events due to hypertension.

By Beat J. Meyer, MD

October 10, 2007

Covering: Patel A et al. for the ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Lancet 2007 Sep 8; 370:829

Optimal Hemoglobin A1c Targets: Guidance from the ACP

General Medicine | Summary and Comment | Subscription Required

The core recommendation is not new, but the ACP commendably focuses on individualizing goals for glycemic control.

By Richard Saitz, MD, MPH, FACP, FASAM

October 9, 2007

Covering: Qaseem A et al. Ann Intern Med 2007 Sep 18; 147:417

Which Antidiabetic Drugs Are Safest for People with Diabetes and Heart Failure?

General Medicine | Summary and Comment | Subscription Required

In this systematic review, metformin was associated with the best outcomes.

By Keith I. Marton, MD

October 9, 2007

Covering: Eurich DT et al. BMJ 2007 Sep 8; 335:497

Aerobic Exercise and Resistance Training Benefit Glycemic Control

General Medicine | Summary and Comment | Free

Physical activity — especially aerobic exercise and resistance training combined — can significantly lower hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

By Richard Saitz, MD, MPH, FACP, FASAM

October 4, 2007

Covering: Sigal RJ et al. Ann Intern Med 2007 Sep 18; 147:357

Screening and Follow-Up for Gestational Diabetes

Women’s Health | Practice Watch | Free

High-risk individuals require both initial screening and repeated testing during and after pregnancy.

By Ann J. Davis, MD

October 4, 2007

Covering: Metzger BE et al. Diabetes Care 2007 Jul 30:251

The Questions Continue About Thiazolidinediones’ Safety

Cardiology | Summary and Comment | Free

A new meta-analysis shows an elevated risk for congestive HF but no increase in cardiovascular death rate with either rosiglitazone or pioglitazone

By Beat J. Meyer, MD

September 28, 2007

Covering: Lago RM et al. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1129

Cleland JGF and Atkin SL. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1103

Montori VM et al. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1104

Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1101

Fitness, Obesity, and Insulin Resistance

Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine | Summary and Comment | Subscription Required

Exercise decreased insulin resistance despite no changes in fat or lean body mass.

By Alain Joffe, MD, MPH, FAAP

September 26, 2007

Covering: Bell LM et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 Aug 14;

Free Full-Text Article

Summary and Comment

In a New Meta-Analysis, Thiazolidinediones Increase CHF but Not Cardiac Death

The results aren’t inconsistent with previous meta-analyses.

The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are known to increase fluid retention and congestive heart failure. Concern about the cardiovascular safety of these drugs has risen since May 2007, when results of a meta-analysis indicated that patients randomized to rosiglitazone had significantly increased risk for myocardial infarction (Journal Watch May 24 2007).

In a new meta-analysis, researchers reviewed seven randomized trials involving 20,191 patients with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes who were randomized to a TZD or a comparator drug or placebo for 12 to 48 months and were studied for outcomes including CHF and cardiovascular death. Patients who received a TZD had significantly increased risk for CHF compared with controls (2.3% vs. 1.4%), but their risk for cardiovascular death was not significantly increased.

Comment: The authors suggest that increased CHF events with the thiazolidinediones likely resulted from fluid retention superimposed on diastolic dysfunction and that such CHF events may have different prognostic implications than those caused by primary deterioration of myocardial function. The absence of increased cardiovascular mortality in this analysis is consistent with the results of both the aforementioned meta-analysis (in which increased mortality failed to reach statistical significance) and subsequent meta-analyses showing no increased mortality with either rosiglitazone or pioglitazone (Journal Watch Sep 11 2007). Noting the complexity of cardiovascular pathophysiology and the limitations of meta-analyses, editorialists decry the paucity of trials powered to measure “patient-centered” outcomes such as cardiovascular events, the overreliance on surrogate endpoints such as HbA1c, and the premature approval of drugs with multiple poorly understood long-term effects. Clinically, says one editorialist, “the jury is still out for the thiazolidinediones.”

Bruce Soloway, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 11, 2007

Citation(s):

Lago RM et al. Congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes given thiazolidinediones: A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1129.

Medline abstract (Free)

Cleland JGF and Atkin SL. Thiazolidinediones, deadly sins, surrogates, and elephants. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1103.

Medline abstract (Free)

Montori VM et al. Patient-important outcomes in diabetes — time for consensus. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1104.

Medline abstract (Free)

Ensuring drug safety: Lessons from the thiazolidinediones. Lancet 2007 Sep 29; 370:1101.

Medline abstract (Free)